This is my video about my diep.io theory hope you people like it.
➨music: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5y-GWhiFmIQ
➨gameplay: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lBFguHDfPQ0
—————————————-­———————————————–
Hi this is Moonhorse96 and we make Youtube video’s (Duh!). We play
games and make music video’s and more random stuff please leave a like to show it you like my video or hit the subscribe
button above!

—————————————-­————————————————-
→ Contact ↪
➨Email: Moonhorse96@gmail.com (please don’t spam☺)
➨Twitter: https://twitter.com/moonhorse96
—————————————-­————————————————-
→ All Playlists ↪
➨Minecraft Tutorials: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLI1UGgXWRySlciOe0kOXW1fTbiK0TDUw6
➨Random Games: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list…
➨Minecraft Pixel Gun: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list…
➨Super Smash Flash 2: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list…
➨Agar.io: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list…
➨Mineblocks: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list…
➨Nightcore: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list…
➨Tutorials: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list…
➨PMV’S: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list…
➨Music Video’s: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list…
—————————————-­————————————————-

—Moonhorse96—

10 COMMENTS

  1. It seems unlikely that, if these are disease-fighting nanobots, that they,
    as they are now, would be competing to find what the best type of bot is.
    The different types of tanks fill different niches, and are better in
    different areas, as is apparent by looking at what people play in each
    gamemode. If these are nanobots in open development to find how to best
    fight disease, it seems more likely that the creators are testing the
    different models to see how good each one is at its job.
    Personally, I doubt the disease-fighting nanobot theory altogether, because
    it doesn’t explain very well why they’re competing amongst themselves, if
    not to find the best individual. Additionally, if they were nanobots able
    to collect material and improve themselves fluidly, doesn’t it seem likely
    they would reproduce, to cover more ground? That clearly isn’t happening,
    because the siblings would have to know not to attack each other.
    A more likely explanation is that the tanks are representative small
    military organizations, be they country, business, or individual, fighting
    to reap and control resources. This would explain the method of growth, the
    reason for competition, as well as the way they fluidly develop. Of course,
    this simple, on the spot explanation doesn’t cover a few things such as the
    gamemodes, especially Sandbox, unlike the nanobot explanation.
    It’s all open to interpretation, of course, as accords to the philosophy of
    science.

  2. So, basically, you’re a nanobot killing single-celled organisms (Shapes) or
    other bots (Tanks) to help prepare to heal multi-celled organisms or find
    the best bot, respectively. Not the meta, but possible. Counterarguments
    could be the fact that the game calls you a tank, but I’m not here to
    instigate.

  3. yeah but why are the ”nanobots” trying to kill each other? the bots would
    help each other. and since spawnkilling is a thing there is no way they are
    nanobots because nanobots don’t kill each other

  4. it’s more likely they are legit tanks and those pentagons, sqaures, and
    triangles are moutains and rocks and you’re extracing the minerals from
    them ”leveling you up” thus making your tank better via the build
    options. the reason. also on your ”proof” below comment you they were
    killing each for testing which is the best. the creator could easily make a
    ”nanobot” that has cannons everywhere and have do 99999 damage, rekting
    the other tanks. so he doesn’t need to test them.

  5. okay I think that the shapes are the defenseless creatures and the crashes
    are the protectors of the shapes thank you for making me think like this:).

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here